Abstract |
Eleonora’s falcon (Falco eleonorae) is a long-distance migratory bird of prey, which winters in
Madagascar and breeds in the Mediterranean Sea, with Greece holding up to 90% of the global
population. The species breeds later than any other bird species globally, having synchronized its
breeding period with the migration of the small passerine birds, upon which it feeds and raises its young.
Clutch size ranges between 1 to 3 eggs with female chicks being generally larger than males, and tend to
be more dispersive. Even though there are several studies regarding the biology and behaviour of the
species, little is known about their sex ratios. Studying sex ratios of wild animals not only aids the
monitoring of reproductive health and growth rates of their populations, but also provides valuable
information regarding the evolution of the species. In natural populations, offspring sex ratios can
greatly vary from parity (1:1 sex ratio) and the observed biases are generally considered to be speciesspecific adaptive strategies that are shaped by natural selection. In birds, offspring sex ratio biases are
correlated with specific factors, such as season and order of hatching, food abundance, parental quality
or social environment. In the only study on the sex ratios in Eleonora’s falcon, a temporal variation in
the offspring sex ratio was observed, with females outnumbering males early in the breeding season.
The aim of this study was to assess the sex ratio of Eleonora’s falcon offspring by using molecular
sexing techniques and to associate any observed variations in the proportion of sexes with specific
ecological and biological factors. Additionally, the sexual size dimorphism of offspring was
investigated. The results showed a slightly male-biased overall sex ratio (Sex ratio = 0.51) that varied
temporally, being female-biased early in the breeding season, as well as early within a brood. The sex
ratio also varied with nest orientation and brood size, but did not differ with nest type. Female chicks
were shown to be 11% heavier than males, and females were larger than males independently of rank,
season, or brood size. The consistency in the results across years, together with the unequal costs of
daughters and sons suggests an adaptive sex ratio bias scheme that is being regulated by different sex
allocation strategies depending on the parental quality, the abundance of food and the quality of the
habitat. However, continued detailed research is necessary to safely interpret the adaptive significance of
the observed bias in sex ratio, and to reject the likelihood of artefacts.
|